Topic started by Dorai (@ p94234.chnet.ttn.net) on Sat Mar 8 00:47:42 .
All times in EST +10:30 for IST.

Is there evidence of this ? Brahmins constantly claim they are not dravidian Tamils.Why do they identify themselves as Brahmins.They seem to be very proud of this ?

Responses:

• Old responses
  
• From: Miami (@ slip129-37-237-13.il.us.prserv.net) on: Sun Mar 16 21:46:56
  
  >>I dont know what justification karu would give for this!!
  
  What justification do you expect? Wait and see. He is again to parrot about Kushboo temple for this.
  
  
• From: Madhavan (@ 213.39.30.18) on: Thu Mar 27 06:24:33
  
  YOU HEAR IN THIS FORUIM BRAHMINS ARE MORE INTELLIGEWNT .INTERESTING ! THEY DON,T CONSIDER THEMSELVES AS TAMILS .
  
  THEY ARE SAYING ARYANS ARE MORE INTELLIGENT THAN DRAVIDIANS WHO ARE TAMILS .
  
  CLEARLY THEIR OWN WORDS BETRAY THEM .
  
  
• From: Krishna (@ cache-syd-aa02.proxy.aol.com) on: Fri Mar 28 21:36:46
  
  Folk:
  
  According to Iyer Heritage Foundation, Brahmins are aryans from Steppe and they migrated/invaded and settled and ixed with Indus dravidians...Here is the website...
  Quote:
  http://www.bharatavarsha.com/iyer.html The Iyers constitute one of the last surviving pockets of ancient Indo-Aryan (Vedic) culture. They have retained this Indo-Aryan legacy for over 5000 years.
  It is interesting that this is the case despite them having lived in the heart of Dravida country for overa thousand years! Perhaps this is due in no small measure to the magnanimity of Dravidian rulers (and indeed the dravidian people themselves) century after century, who not only permitted, but even encouraged Iyers to settle in south India.
  
  ...various Brahmin populations of India differ in their origin, migration, and settlement, although all of them adopted Hinduism in ancient times. A comparison of haplotypes in Iyers with the world population reveals a sharing of haplotypes with Southeast Asian populations. This implies that the ancestors of the Iyers of Madurai, who originated in the Eurasian steppes or Central Asia, might have migrated to India through Southeast Asia, thus developing the prevalent haplotypes en route.
  
  Unquote:
  
  
• From: Balakrishnan S Naicker (@ ear-iso.india.hp.com) on: Sat Mar 29 01:20:26
  
  Shame!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Even educated people here(in this FH) talk about castes & religions.
  
  
• From: Karuvayan (@ cs2417546-174.austin.rr.com) on: Sat Mar 29 03:25:35
  
  Grow you lickers of the white man's boots! The Aryan Invasion theory was invented by Christian Missionaries in order to divide and convert Indians.
  
  
• From: Krishna (@ cache-syd-aa02.proxy.aol.com) on: Sat Mar 29 06:18:37
  
  
  kAR:
  
  ""Grow you lickers of the white man's boots!""
  
  You already declared that you are a ass*licker of brahmins...enjoy yourself...Tell me when did you started licking the boots of whiteman...are you a bootlicker in Austin...?
  
  ">>The Aryan Invasion theory was invented by Christian Missionaries in order to divide and convert Indians.>>"
  
  Do you mean to say that Rig veda that eloquently explains the Aryan invasion was written by Christian Missionaries...
  
  Have you ever read RV and understood whats written there...Words like "black skinned ..noseless..dasyus were driven away from Hariyupi..their castlesd were demolished...68000 white skinned people faught to destory the people who were born from the balck womb..."""
  
  Read carefully and understand the Rig Veda and then blame others if they are wrong or as usuaal in the brahminical way destory all copies of RV or declare that RV was written by Xian missionaries and mullahs...thats the best way...
  
  RV is the solid evidence of AIT and one cannot rewrite it again...
  
  Hope wisdom will prevail..
  
  
  
  
• From: vaidyanathan (@ dialpool-210-214-208-69.maa.sify.net) on: Wed Apr 2 13:50:56
  
  it is well known that ancient brahmins married local women.some of the others merged with brahmins ,some preserved their roots.besides the brahmins very much married the other aryan castes,who inturn married the local tribes.
  even dravidians have iraqi genes just as brahmins have irani.iraq is further away from indian subcontinent than iran.also the members of both these communities quite often chucked out some members who added to the dalit population.moreover the later immigrants to india from different parts of the world intermarried with the local tribes and dalits.
  so whose blood is indian?
  perhaps a person speaking a strange tribal language in a place which has no contact with rest of india.
  such tribes dont have similarity either by genes or by customs to the rest of people.
  what is the proof that these people did not move to india from east?
  moreover the rishis of brahmins were born in india.their ancestors may have been from somewhere else,but stories of their origin indicate mixed origins.does it matter if mother or father was a more indian race?
  even otherwise there is no true indian because homosapiens did not evolve in india.
  
  

Want to post a response?