KADHAL KONDEN - Irritating
Topic started by Kulasekaran (@ 61.1.194.117) on Sun Jul 6 17:15:58 .
All times in EST +10:30 for IST.
just now i returned from the 'Kadhal konden'.. disappointed much. its a mixture.. Did you see our vivek's joke in one of the recently released movies.. he will prepare a story, by mixing the story of nattamai and that of vanathaipola. thats not a joke. this film director has tried viveks idea.
the director would have thought,
(i) its a college movie (first half is college based)
(ii) telling a story, which is so called 'good' (a phycho based story)
(iii) a commercial money making movie (Yuvan music, mumbai heroine)
The director might have been attracted with the movies like Guna, Nandha, Sethu. so he had 'just copied' the idea and made a movie, which irritated me much. the story is obviously artificial. If you had already seen the above listed two movies, i will *not* recommend this movie.
Yuvan's music is unique and the heroine is fairly good.
But still i condemn the style of the directors. who knows, they can shoot a movie which says, a classmates can do anything and everything. yes, as for as their cashbox is considered, they are right. but what about our genuinity??? I strongly condemn such movies.
Ore Erichchal.. :(
Responses:
- Old responses
- From: Roshan (@ 203.115.13.90)
on: Fri Aug 22 01:14:53 EDT 2003
BTW, LLD, have you seen "kakka kakka"? Surya has done a very good job.
- From: LLdasu (@ 203.125.140.10)
on: Fri Aug 22 03:05:42 EDT 2003
not yet Roshan
- From: Joe (@ palo5.pacific.net.sg)
on: Fri Aug 22 03:37:39 EDT 2003
I wonder how this movie is doing so well in TN.It is neither a classic nor a masala.Even it is a mixture of 3 or 4 old movies,which are mostly failed in box office.Really I have no clue for the success of this movie.
- From: Vijay (@ 61.11.76.59)
on: Fri Aug 22 04:39:05 EDT 2003
Here is the Clue.
Always there are some hidden truths.In Hindhi, So many whiteish Khans, shah rukh, salma, and amir ect, alll were muslims
at this time a change came, hrithick roshan entered, no one well remembers his 1st film but it was a BIG BIG HIT.
Like wise, full of whiteish or some alike colored heros, like shaam maddy, ajith, and vikram. Danush face itself is
a bit different in current trend.
"Even it is a mixture of 3 or 4 old movies,which are mostly failed in box office"
the older movies, especially guna, were not having as intresting screenplay as this one.
Apart, the background score, littlebit diff camera angles, diff approach, all clicked.
The first half is totally different, Where do we see such a inferior hero entering in college, tell
atleast one tamil film.The second half is a mix of guna and aalavandhaan but no one could gess the result.
(given that you see the movie without reading any reviews)
- From: Vijay (@ 61.11.76.59)
on: Fri Aug 22 04:46:55 EDT 2003
The same thing goes for jeyam.It has nothing new except that TRAIN. But its very long time since
a film of this kind came.Do we see any film like 'Alaigal Oivathillai" now?
All films has either politics, (BABA/ANBESIVAM)or do resarch on what is love and BOY-GIRL friendship,(punnagai pove/priyamana thozi)
and some films with unimaginable irritating heroism ( all vijay films). So JEYAM and KK are
just some old wines served in new cups.And its long time since these kind of movies came.Thats it.
After one or 2 months either BOYS or PITHAMAGAN or SANDIYAR will replace and washout the KK effect.DAnush have to be different in his next film.I Hope thirudaa thirudi could be a suPer flop
- From: VIJAY (@ 61.11.76.59)
on: Fri Aug 22 04:53:51 EDT 2003
the recent hits like dhool, samy, and KK were not that much liked by thaaikulangal.especially KK.
Also KK is a major hit only in metros. In B and C centres its not doing very well, its juz a normal hit thasall. And its collection didnt cross the sami or padayappa, its well well below them.
In TN, no of ladies going to theatre has reduced considerably, (bcos, they are grabbed by tv serials[waterfall cry] and VCD's) thats why NONVEG movies like dhool sami, KK get a hit.You cant see these movies with family.
- From: Joe (@ palo5.pacific.net.sg)
on: Fri Aug 22 07:00:33 EDT 2003
//the older movies, especially guna, were not having as intresting screenplay as this one. //
huh..interesting..You think this KK is better screen play than Guna?oh God!in this KK is only different thing is potrayal of inferiority complex of the hero as a student .Nothing more interesting..especially the secons half is very irritating.
Still I don't find any reason how it makes sucess to this lrvel..thamizhaga makkalukke velicham!
- From: Thamizhan (@ 219.65.118.75)
on: Fri Aug 22 12:08:43 EDT 2003
////the older movies, especially guna, were not having as intresting screenplay as this one. //
huh..interesting..You think this KK is better screen play than Guna?oh God!in this KK is only ..//
He has just described it as interesting screenplay,means interesting for masses,that's why the film is a huge hit here(TN).
BTW I never considered 'Guna' as a good film,just because kamal was there the film can't be regarded as a good one,in my point of view ,it was a well-thought out,but very badly executed product.
- From: Thamizhan (@ 219.65.118.12)
on: Fri Aug 22 12:29:47 EDT 2003
I think we are talking too much about Dhanush's performance,it will take some more time to judge him,(BTW his latest 'Thiruda thirudi' trailers shows how bad the film will be)why don't we praise the Dir. who has extracted such a performance from him which has no theatrics in it?even the girl acted as Divya(Dunno her name)has done her job well and so is the rest of the cast.May be this is the fate of Tamil industry,if an actor gives a good performance,ppl praise him as great and all that crap(Some body declared Dhanush as Black Kamal),and if somebody gives a string of hits,he will become the matinee idols of so many,streets will be filled with 'Rasigar mandrams' and the actors themselves dreaming to hoist flag in secretariat.
- From: Roshan (@ 203.94.76.186)
on: Sat Aug 23 08:07:24 EDT 2003
>> BTW I never considered 'Guna' as a good film,just because kamal was there the film can't be regarded as a good one,in my point of view ,it was a well-thought out,but very badly executed product.>>
I agree with Thmaizhan!
- From: Vijay (@ 61.11.78.239)
on: Mon Aug 25 23:11:02 EDT 2003
"huh..interesting..You think this KK is better screen play than Guna?oh God!"
there is nothing revolutionary in this story.Then what makes this movie run full of packed house?Camera ,music cannot cotribute for whole success.Then its only screenplay.One cannot tell danush acting also.Bcos, there are lot of kamal film with excellent acting which flopped.
Guna can be Holistic,But people want entertainment, which is not found in Guna.
Also pulambals like "people's taste is becoming bad" is not correct, its just a cycle.
"especially the secons half is very irritating"
the second half is where Director mixes Aalavandaan and Guna intrestingly, very intrestingly!
- From: Vijay (@ 61.11.78.239)
on: Mon Aug 25 23:14:12 EDT 2003
Kamal potta palappala Kuppaigalil Onru GUNA.
- From: Vijay (@ 61.11.78.239)
on: Mon Aug 25 23:15:47 EDT 2003
"Still I don't find any reason how it makes sucess to this level"
If one couldnt find the reason, its better to leave it.
- From: Vijay (@ 61.11.78.239)
on: Mon Aug 25 23:48:32 EDT 2003
"Kamal potta palappala Kuppaigalil Onru GUNA."
The reason i say like this is:-
1.In KK, the girl agrees to come and stay in forest with dhanu, only for the reason that she should meet her lover.
2.But in Guna, kamal lifts the girl from her family and places in a cave!!!, and also the girl gets convinced with all this and also she like Guna. Is this an intresting screenplay?????
At this point, KK is more practical than Guna.
Makers of Guna and its 'Admirers' can feel and get an Alpa santhosham that their copied story runs well.
- From: Weirdo (@ 219.95.173.123)
on: Wed Aug 27 05:48:58 EDT 2003
Tamil cinema finally releases a good movie and we still have people whining about it!
- From: Rani (@ )
on: Mon Sep 8 12:08:36
There is no one better actor than SHAHRUKH KHAN face it he has the awards to prove it. No one can live up to his standards. Hrithick, well the only movies that become a hit with him are his daddy's movies with out his daddy he can' create a hit film at all.
- From: haruisgh (@ 61.11.76.58)
on: Mon Sep 15 07:57:48 EDT 2003
this heroine is tooooooooooooooooooooo
sexyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1
her breast is soft and very big
- From: SHANKAR (@ 203.76.163.2)
on: Mon Sep 15 08:09:27 EDT 2003
Kathal Konden is a far better than the rubbish BOYS
- From: sd (@ 210.195.72.17)
on: Mon Sep 15 11:13:14 EDT 2003
Story wise kk may be better..but boys is worth watching in the cineplex
- From: arun (@ )
on: Mon Oct 27 07:03:00
i liked kk very much exspecially the dir/hero.both are plus in the film while many of the masala films are entering tamil film industry selvaragavan has proved that kk is a director film for this i apprecieate him and wish him all the success for his futher films/and i saw priyamana thozhi recenly i loved that film very much it is an superb story/i wish vikraman for his further projects
- From: Vanmathi (@ 203.143.133.7)
on: Tue Nov 4 23:49:03 EST 2003
I feel that tamil films though dey r needless to resemble reality,yet its not practical for all e viewers to accept extroadinary 'stuff',which r uncommonly practiced in e real areas.Therefore i agree with Kulasekaran and also emphasize that OUR tamil movies do need OUR GENUITY....hope that Tamil films will transform to a better acceptance by Tamil viewers!
- From: divya (@ ppp-219.65.110.78.chn.vsnl.net.in)
on: Tue Nov 11 09:20:51 EST 2003
lovely film is kadhal kondain. the best i liked then thiruda thirudi. now waiting for dhanush next movie
- From: sada (@ 210.187.9.234)
on: Wed Nov 12 21:06:08 EST 2003
woi kula i think something wrong with ur brains.
dhanush is on of great actor give us something
new in tamil cinema u should thank him for that.u wan same masala movie like winner,ira nilam,some movie whom vijayakanth acting.ur like that type movie.if yes ur not have a good taste.
- From: Tamil Nutz (@ 203.81.110.43)
on: Wed Nov 19 15:12:40 EST 2003
IN KK what i really apeciate is.. The way directer touched that Child Abuse subject. He got guts.
Of course, its a rendum kettan. Not a classic, not a masala. BUT Camera is good, Story is good, and Acting from Danush is excellent in THIS movie. Songs r very good.
What does matter is, this movie KK is better than the usual MASALAs we get.
- From: Tamil Nutz (@ 203.81.110.43)
on: Wed Nov 19 15:13:17 EST 2003
IN KK what i really apeciate is.. The way directer touched that Child Abuse subject. He got guts.
Of course, its a rendum kettan. Not a classic, not a masala. BUT Camera is good, Story is good, and Acting from Danush is excellent in THIS movie. Songs r very good.
What does matter is, this movie KK is better than the usual MASALAs we get.
Tell your friend about this topic
Want to post a response?
Back to the Forum