kamal/rajni - a comparison

Topic started by rajah (@ fcomet.singnet.com.sg) on Sun Nov 25 12:16:36 .
All times in EST +10:30 for IST.

being a tamilian we are left with not much of choice when coming to quality top 2 actors. being in my late thirties, i grew in the period of sivaji and mgr. in the 80's we have kamal and rajni creeping in. though kamal was the darling during the 80's and early 90's just like madhavan now,age caught with him. though rajni had the bad guy and second roles, his strong believe in philosophy and knowing his strength help to stay in people heart even today. rajni compared to kamal is not a excellent character player but he has studied himself well and paced himselg well chosing idealistic films and movies that live a message in a movie goer. padayappa, muthu were good examples. songs, acting, excellent screenplay were given good dosage. kamal being a good character role player did some good shots in comdies like avvai shanmugi but later started doing experimental movies like hai ram who has one of the worse screenplay otherwise it was excellent attempt. latedly alavandan again showed poor screenplay and story buildup. i think those around kamal is not giving open and frank suggestions to correct him. thats the problem with indian cinema, they shake head to top directors and actors. i think rajni has a good think team, thats why his film are successful. his deep trust in god helps in always.


Responses:


  Tell your friend about this topic

Want to post a response?

Post a response:

Name:

E-mail:


Please Reload to see your response


Back to the Forum