Topic started by chandru (@ jlp-204-55.tm.net.my) on Wed May 28 15:33:54 .
All times in EST +10:30 for IST.

they movie so intersting in first half with lovely scences.superb comedy by vivek.cutie trisha wonderful performance.great music and songs by harris jeyaraj.in second half why should
madhavan in the movie.his scenes really make the whole movie look like crap.a lecturer which should be good example for students make rowdysem
in school.and a girl look at him fall in love. what a crap story is it.and the heroine says if is lover dies .he also dies.wat a hell is it.i really want to slap trisha went she says that.and in the climax.how many time we must watch train climax.it is really look boring.want of the great movie spoils with un wanted stupid scenes.

Responses:

• From: rajesh (@ ppp-219.65.105.103.chn.vsnl.net.in) on: Thu May 29 01:37:46 EDT 2003
  
  can anybody eloborate the story of lesa lesa please?
  
  
• From: Dhanya (@ 202.9.180.187) on: Thu May 29 03:44:13 EDT 2003
  
  haha...Big joke man!!!!
  Maddy's spoils the movie....yeah maybe....after seeing madhavan's portrayal....I found tht there was no depth in both Trisha's & Shaam's characters....& finally had to call this movie a crap.Madhavan..is at his best so the rest of the film looks intolerable....So may be you are right :)
  
  
• From: Sri devi (@ bbcache-10.singnet.com.sg) on: Sat May 31 10:26:20 EDT 2003
  
  "OF COURSE DHANYA" IT'S TRUE! MADHAVAN is fantastic in the movie... 1st half i really hated all the stupid and lousy scenes by SHAMM! but 2nd half Maddy only makes the movie different. If the movie have a good run and thats only one reason,its MADHVAN'S performance! Hey CHANDRU Don't talk rubbish! (MADDY pathi pesune, unnoda vaaye kilechiruven CHANDRU)
  
  
• From: KALLURI BHARATHI (@ ppp-219.65.105.181.chn.vsnl.net.in) on: Sat May 31 11:18:07 EDT 2003
  
  hey sridevi enna itthana naala alaye kanume indha pakkamnu paathen enkitta dose vaangaradhukkune vandhuttiya.In lesa lesa ONLY SHAAMS ACTING IS NICE.Madhavan the roudy behaves like a roudy.he acts like a mental.he shows like PSYCHO.WHAT CHANDRU MENTIONED IS ONLY CORRECT.A LECTURER WHO SHOULD BE AN EXAMPLE TO THE STUDENT HIMSELF IS SHOWING ROUDISM.IF I SEE MADHAVAN NOW I WILL BEAT HIM WITH SLIPPERS.if i see you now i will beat with shoes.MADHAVAN IS A MD FELLOW.ONLY SHAAM ACTED VERY WELL.MADHAVAN IS A GAY.MADHAVAN WILL GO TO HELL & SUCK HIS COCK.(VAAYA MUDIKITU KADA MUUDEVI,VAAYA THORANDHA VAAIYA THECCHIDUVEN)
  
  
• From: weirdo (@ 219.95.159.236) on: Mon Jun 2 08:16:37 EDT 2003
  
  It was strange to see a college professor throwing a bomb in the public! Madhavan's character wasn't really good in the movie but MADDY RULEZ!
  
  
• From: Tamil (@ ppp-219.65.118.110.chn.vsnl.net.in) on: Tue Jun 3 03:27:49 EDT 2003
  
  You Stupids are all talking as if MADHAVAN or SHAAM directed the movie.Both the characters were etched out by Priyadharsan.Whether the movie was great or lame,give it to Priyadharsan.If madhavan's cameo spoils the show,he takes no responsibility for that,it is the director's mistake.If that part only has depth(as if someone feel),again give it to the dir.
  I am not a Priyadharsan Fan.But i think both madhavan and Shaam did their parts well.Whether it is good or bad goes to the maker.(This is applicable to any film)
  
  
• From: kavetha@7 (@ 219.92.212.86) on: Tue Jun 3 06:15:41 EDT 2003
  
  lesa lesa was a great movie.nobody spoiled it,actually!It was interesting with both sham and madhavan in it.So, nobody takes the blaming
  
  
• From: shima (@ proxy2.ihug.co.nz) on: Tue Jun 3 23:09:51 EDT 2003
  
  Hello Sri devi and Kalluri Barathi,
  Madhavan and Sham both are acting for money.Avanga rendu peroda personal charecter enna yenru namakku theriyathu. Avar avarukku yaroda acting pidikkutho athai rasippom. Neengal yen yaro iruvarukkaha fight Panna vendum?
  
  
• From: gunaa (@ 203.115.201.136) on: Wed Jun 4 03:10:25 EDT 2003
  
  
  vanthuthanga appa!
  
  
• From: kilake pogum rayil (@ mtb-216-84.tm.net.my) on: Fri Jun 13 09:28:07 EDT 2003
  
  you ppl giving superb perfomance here..wow you all should be in laysa laysa not sham ,madhavan or trisha.
  
  
• From: Sanj (@ 202.67.120.17) on: Sat Jun 14 01:20:15 EDT 2003
  
  Chandru, You are spot on man.
  
  They made a whole movie about students ruining university and all that, in the movie Student No 1 and another couple of movies...one by sathiya raj. Why in the world did they think of crap like that to come in to this movie.
  
  Laysa Laysa was moving along just great. Comedy was so real. Songs superb. Mathavan wasn't needed in the movie. What a crap second half. Atleast they could have thought of some other way for Matty and Trisha to fall in love. He kicks bad students. He goes and throws a bomb at one. A school bus get blown up. And he is in jail. That is just tamil movie standard. What didn't they make it that when matty farted, the whole bus got blown up?
  
  To me, Mathavan is a better actor than Sham. But this was Sham's movie. I would like to stress the point that it wasn't Mathavan's fault. It was the director's. I didn't feel for Trish or Matty, because it was shown as a close love. You are spot on Chandru, Matty's character made the movie so bad in the end. That is just my Opinion.
  
  
• From: Sanj (@ 202.67.120.17) on: Sat Jun 14 01:23:10 EDT 2003
  
  Mistake...it should read as
  
  I didn't feel for Trish or Matty, because it wasn't shown as a close love. You are spot on Chandru, Matty's character made the movie so bad in the end. That is just my Opinion. Again I stress the point it wasn't Matty's fault.
  
  
• From: sad (@ 219.93.209.122) on: Mon Jun 16 03:08:01 EDT 2003
  
  not madhavan spoil the movie..it is such a stupid movie..trisha is married to madhavan and in seconds she can just 4get him and go with sham
  wat stupid story!!!i was waiting eagerly to c this movie but it turn out to be a biggest flop..
  
  
• From: nathan (@ 203.106.49.237) on: Wed Jun 25 03:28:56 EDT 2003
  
  dai madayangala,poi neyga padam nadichi parungada, apathan ungaluku nadikira thanme theriyum.....
  
  
• From: Anand (@ 62-241-185-219.dsl.pipex.com) on: Wed Jul 2 16:27:38 EDT 2003
  
  I liked the movie. You can't say which is good and which is bad, can you? Try not to comment something.
  
  
• From: Anand (@ 62-241-185-219.dsl.pipex.com) on: Wed Jul 2 16:27:46 EDT 2003
  
  I liked the movie. You can't say which is good and which is bad, can you? Try not to comment something.
  
  
• From: Anand (@ 62-241-185-219.dsl.pipex.com) on: Wed Jul 2 16:28:07 EDT 2003
  
  I liked the movie. You can't say which is good and which is bad, can you? Try not to comment something.
  
  
• From: kulasekaran (@ 61.1.194.95) on: Tue Jul 8 15:48:59 EDT 2003
  
  >they movie so intersting in first half with >lovely scences.
  me: ofcourse they are slow too..
  
  >superb comedy by vivek.
  me: its a comedy mixed with the story. good.
  
  >cutie trisha wonderful performance.
  me: i wont accept this statement at all. As per your views, if madhavan is bad, trisha is worst in lasa lasa.
  
  >great music and songs by harris jeyaraj.
  me: yes. good.
  
  >in second half why should madhavan in the >movie.his scenes really make the whole movie >look like crap.a lecturer which should be good >example for students make rowdysem
  >in school.and a girl look at him fall in love. >what a crap story is it.
  me: it happens yaar.. I can show you the examples.
  
  >the heroine says if is lover dies .he also >dies.wat a hell is it.i really want to slap >trisha went she says that.and in the climax.how >many time we must watch train climax.it is >really look boring.want of the great movie >spoils with un wanted stupid scenes.
  
  yes. the climax is nothing but kuppai. but if madhavan is not coming in that film, then second half also be a kerala alwa, so that it will not go inside, and it will not come outside.
  
  
  
• From: lAYSA Laysa (@ toronto-ppp217038.sympatico.ca) on: Fri Jul 11 20:58:44 EDT 2003
  
  
  I Agree with some of you. Madhaven did spoil the other half of the movie. don't mistake me, i am a Madhaven fan, but they should have given him a different role.
  Trisha's role was stupid. She's married to Madhaven and in the end, she goes off with Shaam!
  Shaam, u should have left her and came for me!!!!
  (SIGH)
  
  
• From: Shakthi (@ 203-195-199-244.now-india.net.in) on: Mon Jul 14 05:48:46 EDT 2003
  
  its a remake of some malyalam movie
  
  can someone tell me
  
  who casted in
  
  shaam
  madhavan
  and
  trisha's roles in malyalam?
  
  movie is ok...........
  
  I cant accept the fact, that madhavan a responsible good and kind hearted professor, would be foolish enough to throw a bomb in a public place, where innocents can get hurt..........
  
  MAdhavan's entry makes the movie, dull...and serious.
  His role is not justified. Just to make a twist in the movie and create a storyline for her sadness, MADHAVAN'S CHARACTER is introduced. ITS A WASTE
  
  but madhavan's performance is very good as usual
  
  
  
  
  
• From: robin (@ chef36.rutgers.edu) on: Wed Aug 13 13:13:54
  
  in malayalam second half is not like tamil
  
  sham is playeed by suresh gopi
  vivek by jayaram
  maddy by mohanlal
  trisha by manju warrier
  but mohanlal only appears for a few seconds
  and doesn't lie to the girl
  the srinivasan kochin haneefa comedy is also new.
  in malayalm comedy is by jayaram only.
  
  
• From: Rasa (@ mtl58-10b-155-182.dialup.sprint-canada.net) on: Fri Aug 22 08:52:06 EDT 2003
  
  Shaam was so cute, unlike mad cow Madhavan. Why the hell Madhavan was in the film for? They should've replaced Madhavan with another actor!!! Plus it's a bad example for to say a prof. and student can marry!!!!!!!!!! Maddy sucks!!!!!! Shaam can act good, but he chooses bad stories, that's all.
  
  
• From: vikram fan (@ 211.24.9.132) on: Sun Aug 24 02:14:02 EDT 2003
  
  u people need to get an english tutor.... ahahahaha
  
  
• From: brenda (@ 202.187.24.11) on: Mon Aug 25 23:13:23 EDT 2003
  
  madhavan didn't spoil laysa laysa but he spoiled shyam's reputation in the movie
  
  
• From: SANKARAN (@ ) on: Mon Sep 15 07:03:49
  
  TRISHA IS SAVADI. MAVALE WHO EVER TALK BAD ABOUT TRISHA, I WILL JUST F.U.C.K. YOU. MADHAVAN'S ACTING WAS NOT BAD, STILL I CAN'T DIGEST THE SCENE WHEN HE THREW BOMB IN THE PUBLIC.AND SHYAM IS A PEE PUNDE. I FEEL LIKE THROWING ACID ON HIS FACE. LAST BUT NOT LEAST, FOR ALL THE GALS OUT THERE, I LOVE YOU. BYE.
  
  
• From: SANKARAN (@ ) on: Mon Sep 15 07:04:12
  
  TRISHA IS SAVADI. MAVALE WHO EVER TALK BAD ABOUT TRISHA, I WILL JUST F.U.C.K. YOU. MADHAVAN'S ACTING WAS NOT BAD, STILL I CAN'T DIGEST THE SCENE WHEN HE THREW BOMB IN THE PUBLIC.AND SHYAM IS A PEE PUNDE. I FEEL LIKE THROWING ACID ON HIS FACE. LAST BUT NOT LEAST, FOR ALL THE GALS OUT THERE, I LOVE YOU. BYE.
  
  
• From: HARI RAM S/O MUTHUSINGA (@ 210.186.3.172) on: Mon Sep 15 07:14:38 EDT 2003
  
  HEY, THE MOVIE SUX. MADDY SUX. SHYAM SUX. WHOEVER WRITE COMMENT IN THIS SECTION OTHER THAN ME ARE T.H.E.V.E.D.I.Y.A.S. WHOEVER DARE TO TALK FACE TO FACE WITH ME CALL ME LAH S.U.N.N.I. MY NUMBER IS 019-6970057. CALL ME LAH L.A.N.C.A.U. I DARE ANY GUY WITH BALLS OUT THERE TO CALL ME IF YOU ARE BORN TO ONE FATHER AND ONE MOTHER.
  
  
• From: karma (@ 202.184.182.8) on: Thu Sep 25 01:19:57 EDT 2003
  
  trishaaaaaaaaaa,,,,,,,,,her boobs and ass...i just wanna lick it n suck it
  
  
• From: regag (@ hse-mtl-ppp73098.qc.sympatico.ca) on: Tue Sep 21 19:17:32
  
  jbdsajgkrtfuwuersugfgtresakgugkfgitg4yitergfydfsyfgyerayfyfareyfyfrewyafrhjfyeyjfeyfyujeafyyeafyrgewaigeyawgiGdyewafuKhdgywejaygduywakhdguywagukHDgwueafGCuwfyeuiuhaGyfwgueahgfuwakugfuiakhyujvzefgogfuaehfajgukdgueagduigawygewuaiwheyuawgfauigdewauigdwuefikwgeiauwfiegawiugdwaieguoeftieu7a7auw
  
  
• From: MANI (@ dsl-tn-185.38.101.203.touchtelindia.net) on: Wed Sep 29 13:46:00 EDT 2004
  
  MADHAVAN ACTING WONDERFUL!!!!he excelled in his acting.
  the movies +vepoint was songs,madhavan
  
  -vepoints a stretched 1st half,climax
  
  
• From: TRISHA KRISHNAN (@ ) on: Fri Oct 22 12:38:58
  
  lol...
  
  

Want to post a response?