Topic started by Kajan (@ wc05.ym.rnc.net.cable.rogers.com) on Thu Jun 6 14:37:43 .
All times in EST +10:30 for IST.

Hi,
Popularity brings everything to light! Example Kamal's case.

We make mistakes, but these people earned popularity in the industries like cinema, media etc have to build good image ?

we could c discussions, comments and chats everywhere. it seems to be difficult to put fullstop.

So those who at light has to build good image or there must be a strict rule or law for disturbing or discussing on others life ?

I think u could bring URLs for ur arguments!

Responses:

• From: Suppamma (@ cache86.156ce.scvmaxonline.com.sg) on: Fri Jun 7 17:35:49
  
  Is this a discussion or an assignment???
  
  
• From: Shakthi (@ bangdp-34-99.mantraonline.com) on: Sat Jun 8 02:38:45
  
  Suppamma,
  
  LOL (Laughing). You reflected my thoughts
  
  :-)
  
  
• From: Kajan (@ wc05.ym.rnc.net.cable.rogers.com) on: Sun Jun 9 04:35:16
  
  Suppamma & Shakthi,
  
  thx 4 ur response. Cause of the this thread is my confusion about talking of others' personnel life.
  I am sad because of no positive response.
  
  Shakthi,
  
  u r the author of the thread
  "Why arn't there anymore sensible thread in tamizh film section???? "
  
  at URL,
  http://forumhub.com/tfilms/20992.13.18.53.html
  
  but there negative response from u. Bur even submitting an assignment is not problem 4 u, what u have done so many times on good topics.
  
  Suppama,
  I jave understood what kind of person ur!
  
  
• From: Kajan (@ wc05.ym.rnc.net.cable.rogers.com) on: Sun Jun 9 04:36:50
  
  Sorry 4 mistake, negative response here itself.
  
  
• From: Shakthi (@ bangdp-35-178.mantraonline.com) on: Sun Jun 9 05:14:05
  
  Kajan,
  
  I just joked. I would surely respond to this thread. Kool!
  
  Look forward for the submisison of my assignment. (Just kiddin kk?)
  
  :-)
  
  
• From: Shakthi (@ bangdp-35-178.mantraonline.com) on: Sun Jun 9 05:16:54
  
  Kajan,
  
  Personnel- personnel manager..i.e. Human resourse management.
  
  Personal- things personal or too intimate for someone.
  
  I know its just a typo error....still just said it.
  
  
  I feel, so many ppl confuse these too words. They are pronouned different too.
  
  Personnel is pronounced like
  per-per
  so- saw
  nnel-rhymes like well
  
  NOM
  
  
• From: Raghu (@ 212.2.14.241) on: Mon Jun 10 09:04:23
  
  shakti;
  
  yappa, meendum ungha lecture arambichiteenghala, NOM :))
  
  
• From: Shakthi (@ bangdp-34-81.mantraonline.com) on: Fri Jun 14 15:15:23
  
  Do we stick to our limits?
  
  The answer is NO. The answer had been NO. The answer would be NO.
  It is a common chracteristic of any normal human being to poke his nose into other people's personal affairs. It would not be criticised openly in case of general public whom we meet in the street everyday. Criticism would not be made public, about our neighbours and friends, regarding whom we know dozens
  of personal stories. There we do not highlight the happenings, ridicule or point out mistakes.
  
  The reason is, we respect him or her because we know them personally.
  
  Hence, to gossip or poking into other people's privacy is human weakness. One is happy doing it with actors or public figures. Unfortunately its an unsaid rule, that the lime light, lights up even ur private life.
  
  Now, actors need to build good image? Who said so? It is their talent we need to look at. Not what they are up to behind the screens.
  
  As long as one works in a factory, his productivity should be high, a labourer's manager is not concerned with his private life, if his morale is good.
  
  But public figures, who morally guide you, or lead u, then they NEED TO BUILD good image. Again because its mandatory upon them to build good image, talking of their private life cannot be banned.
  
  Example::
  
  Talks about any politician's honesty. Here again his personal life or sex life, should be left free, and not commented upon. In what way does that affect his ability to perform duties?
  
  If religious leaders, who are also public images, violate from moral values, only there we have right to talk on it. This case is the only exception.
  
  
  Therefore media ppl, politicians etc need not be forced to build good image Definitely you cannot put a stop to gossips about media people.
  
  Its human right's violation.
  Indian constitution permits
  RIGHT TO TALK!!!
  
  
• From: Kajan (@ wc05.ym.rnc.net.cable.rogers.com) on: Sat Jun 15 16:55:19
  
  thx 4 good response.
  
  " But public figures, who morally guide you, or lead u, then they NEED TO BUILD good image. ".....
  Pointed out with good examples.
  
  what I feel , media must be neutral in their
  articles.
  
  
  
  
  
• From: Kajan (@ wc05.ym.rnc.net.cable.rogers.com) on: Tue Jun 25 03:44:06
  
  mmmmmm..
  
  I saw some members mentioned not to interfere into personal life. (Specifically about kamal)
  I dodn't critisize anyone, but something wrong .
  they i have to build good image i feel.
  I expect ur comments about my suggestion
  
  
• From: Shakthi (@ bangdp-33-21.mantraonline.com) on: Thu Jun 27 16:17:49
  
  Nah i disagreee
  
  Its his life...he has a right to live how he wants it.
  
  Are u his moral science teacher to guide him thro the life?
  
  Does he interfere with ur life, saying
  
  1. marry x not y
  2. have just 2 children
  3. pay ur income tax on time
  4. change ur career right now
  etc.??
  
  if he does, will u not sue him????
  
  after all its ur life. If at all any person can talk or decide on ur life it is kajan.
  
  Being a public figure does not make u a role-model.
  
  Its parents duty to educate children as to what to admire and what to forgo while judging a person.
  
  
• From: Kajan (@ wc05.ym.rnc.net.cable.rogers.com) on: Thu Jun 27 19:05:25
  
  But do thes artist represent such characters in movies ?
  
  No becos there is no space in the society !
  
  I agree that it is our own rights, but if they fail to maintain their image, there will be discussion about his or her bad moves as well as good ones.
  
  
  

Want to post a response?