Like any QT film, it's a motley of genres with imaginative subversions. He breaks the canons, and could render morbidity (WWII, and Holocaust, no less) in a whole new style.
Everyone talks about Colonel Landa, and Shosanna (no coincidence they are both appropriately cast with Europeans) and rightly so. But even Pitt's role is not bad writing or a casting mistake (he comes off well with half-arsed texan accent and an insensitive Nazi-to-Nazis. Landa taking a piss on Pitt's phony Italian makeover is Hilarious! Also, Basterds are no focal point. It's sort of like, the good (Shosanna), the bad (Colonel Landa) and the Ugly (Basterds) of a 'spaghetti WWII'. Colonel Landa like Angel Eyes(Lee Cleef) is a crafty *******, and utterly dangerous that it takes no sweat to double-cross the employer & work out on his own! Leone's masterpiece broke traditional good-bad Western Dramatology into three-fold shades of Grey. QT subverts a different genre, and a scenario sacrilegious to certain sections. It's a challenging task. History is at peril, but art bestows liberty. QT makes no bones about breaking the rules. |